revit-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to revit-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceAllows AI assistants to interact with Autodesk Revit through the MCP protocol, enabling the AI to create, modify, and delete elements in Revit projects.15123 npm1-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables Large Language Models to access and manipulate Autodesk Revit models through a pyRevit-based bridge and the Model Context Protocol.20193MIT
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceConnects MCP clients like Claude, Codex, and Cursor to a running Autodesk Revit session for typed BIM queries, verified model edits, family authoring, exports, and Power BI workflows. It is open-source, Apache-2.0, and designed for reliable, verified outcomes.-
- AlicenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables seamless communication between Claude AI and Autodesk Revit, allowing users to access and interact with Revit model information through natural language.618-
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to execute designer-confirmed code and reusable capability packs inside a running Autodesk Revit instance.5MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAI-powered control of Autodesk Revit through the Model Context Protocol, enabling natural language BIM workflows.101-
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but there is some overlap between ai_element_filter, get_current_view_elements, and get_selected_elements in retrieving elements, which could cause confusion. However, their specific focuses (intelligent querying, current view, selected elements) help differentiate them. Other tools like create_line_based_element and create_surface_based_element are clearly distinct based on element type.
The naming follows a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_line_based_element, delete_element, get_available_family_types) with minor deviations. One tool, operate_element, uses a vague verb 'operate' instead of something more specific like 'modify', and send_code_to_revit is slightly less structured, but overall the pattern is clear and readable.
With 13 tools, this is well-scoped for a Revit MCP server covering element creation, querying, modification, and execution. Each tool serves a specific function in the domain, such as creating different element types or retrieving element information, without being overly bloated or sparse.
The tool set provides good coverage for core Revit operations, including creation (point, line, surface-based), deletion, querying, and modification. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit tool for updating element parameters beyond color or transparency, and the domain could benefit from more specialized tools for tasks like scheduling or exporting, but agents can work around these with existing tools like operate_element or send_code_to_revit.