create_automation

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds the key behavioral detail that the automation is created paused by default and requires an explicit toggle to activate, which is beyond what annotations declare. It doesn't mention error handling or prerequisites, but annotations already indicate this is a mutation (readOnlyHint=false) and not destructive, so the added value is moderate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the action and resource, and each sentence contributes essential information: the creation purpose and the paused-by-default/activation behavior. No waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with nested objects and no output schema, the description covers the essential creation flow and the next step. It doesn't mention that 'steps' is optional per the schema, but the schema itself communicates that. Overall, it's adequately complete for an agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for all 5 parameters, including nested step objects and enums. The description only rephrases the concept of trigger and steps without adding new parameter-level details, so it meets the baseline but does not go further.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'create' and clearly identifies the resource as an 'automation workflow' composed of a trigger and ordered steps. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like get_automation or toggle_automation, making the purpose unmistakable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly directs the agent to use toggle_automation to activate the workflow after reviewing steps, providing a clear follow-up action. While it doesn't list when not to use this tool, the reference to toggle_automation gives adequate usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.