Skip to main content
Glama
MikeyBeez

reasoning-tools

by MikeyBeez

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
boolean_evaluateA

Systematically evaluate boolean expressions with step-by-step verification

date_calculateC

Perform date arithmetic with computational verification

object_countC

Systematically count objects by category with verification

state_trackB

Track object positions through a series of swaps/moves

systematic_verifyC

Apply 6-step systematic reasoning protocol to any problem

format_validateC

Validate answer format and convert to expected format

helpA

Get comprehensive documentation for all reasoning tools functions

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

B3.3/5.0

Scored across 7 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Each tool has a distinct purpose with clear descriptions: boolean_evaluate for boolean expressions, date_calculate for dates, object_count for counting, state_track for tracking moves, systematic_verify for general verification, and format_validate for formatting. The only potential overlap is systematic_verify being general-purpose, but it is clearly distinct from the specialized tools.

Naming Consistency2/5

Most tool names follow an object_verb pattern (boolean_evaluate, date_calculate, object_count, state_track, format_validate), but systematic_verify uses adjective_verb and help is a standalone verb. This inconsistency makes the naming convention less predictable.

Tool Count5/5

Seven tools is well within the typical 3-15 range for a focused utility server. Each tool covers a distinct reasoning task, and the count feels neither sparse nor bloated.

Completeness4/5

The toolset covers several common reasoning tasks (boolean, dates, counting, state tracking, verification, and formatting). The inclusion of systematic_verify and format_validate provides general-purpose coverage that can adapt to other problems, mitigating the need for more specialized tools. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no sequence prediction or arithmetic beyond dates), but they are not critical for the stated purpose.

Maintenance

ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues