Skip to main content
Glama
MikeyBeez

reasoning-tools

by MikeyBeez

Related Servers

Alternatives to reasoning-tools

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides exact, deterministic tools for math, dates, units, validation, and more to AI agents, returning precise answers with explicit assumptions and warnings instead of model guesses.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform accurate local computations including arbitrary-precision math, date handling, unit conversion, subnet calculations, encoding, hashing, and text analysis, all without network calls or API keys.
      27
      736 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform 22 unit conversions and common calculations such as length, weight, temperature, volume, tip, percentage, date difference, age, currency, cooking, and fuel consumption.
      14
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides over 500 deterministic tools for math, conversions, validation, hashing, and more, enabling AI agents to perform accurate calculations and data transformations without hallucination.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides a suite of deterministic tools for time calculations, math, and string manipulation that LLMs often struggle to perform accurately. It also includes utilities for secure randomness, data validation, and basic network operations like DNS lookups.
      5 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides deterministic, verifiable text/code/measurement utilities for AI agents, enabling tasks like unit conversion, citation formatting, diffing, proofreading, readability scoring, and syntax checking with re-executable proof.
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose with clear descriptions: boolean_evaluate for boolean expressions, date_calculate for dates, object_count for counting, state_track for tracking moves, systematic_verify for general verification, and format_validate for formatting. The only potential overlap is systematic_verify being general-purpose, but it is clearly distinct from the specialized tools.

    Naming Consistency2/5

    Most tool names follow an object_verb pattern (boolean_evaluate, date_calculate, object_count, state_track, format_validate), but systematic_verify uses adjective_verb and help is a standalone verb. This inconsistency makes the naming convention less predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Seven tools is well within the typical 3-15 range for a focused utility server. Each tool covers a distinct reasoning task, and the count feels neither sparse nor bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The toolset covers several common reasoning tasks (boolean, dates, counting, state tracking, verification, and formatting). The inclusion of systematic_verify and format_validate provides general-purpose coverage that can adapt to other problems, mitigating the need for more specialized tools. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no sequence prediction or arithmetic beyond dates), but they are not critical for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues