Skip to main content
Glama

search_codebase

Search indexed code files using regex patterns or natural-language queries to find relevant symbols and code.

Instructions

Regex (default) or semantic (semantic=true) search across indexed files.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
patternYesRegex pattern (regex mode) or natural-language description (semantic mode).
max_resultsNoMaximum number of results to return (default 100, 0 = unlimited).
ignore_generatedNoSkip generated/minified files (default true). Regex mode only.
semanticNoIf true, interpret `pattern` as a description and rank symbols by embedding cosine similarity. Returns enriched hits with signature/docstring/score. Default false (regex).
projectNoProject name/path (default: active).
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description does not disclose read-only nature, performance impacts, or side effects. Only mentions mode-specific behavior for ignore_generated (regex only).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence front-loads core functionality without extraneous words. Could be slightly more structured but effective.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Absent output schema, description lacks return value details, pagination info, or behavior for large result sets. Adequate for simple understanding but incomplete for complex use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so schema already documents parameters. Description adds minimal value by indicating default mode (regex) and that semantic mode returns enriched hits.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states regex or semantic search across indexed files, but does not differentiate from sibling tools like capture_search or corpus_query that also perform search.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus other search-related siblings. The description only mentions default vs semantic mode without usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Mibayy/token-savior'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server