Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to token-savior

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server that enables Large Language Models to interact with Git repositories through a robust API, supporting operations like repository initialization, cloning, file staging, committing, and branch management.
    28
    2,535 npm
    242
    Apache 2.0

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    An MCP server that provides structure-aware code analysis (symbol trees, dependencies, docs) to reduce AI agent token consumption by up to 99%, along with Git commit intelligence.
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An MCP server that provides semantic code intelligence by pre-indexing codebases, enabling AI agents to query symbol relationships and code structure directly, reducing costs and tool calls.
    128,535 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An MCP server that indexes codebases into a local graph and provides on-demand context retrieval for AI coding agents, reducing token usage by tracking session history and delivering only relevant code subgraphs.
    7 npm
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    MCP server for local-first code intelligence, providing structural code graph, semantic search, and impact analysis to AI agents.
    2
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An MCP server for efficient code indexing and symbol retrieval using tree-sitter AST parsing to fetch specific functions or classes without loading entire files. It significantly reduces AI token costs by providing O(1) byte-offset access to code components across multiple programming languages.
    -
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    An MCP server that provides ultra-efficient code exploration through AST analysis, reducing LLM token usage by up to 95% while enabling instant call graph generation and dependency analysis for massive codebases.
    MIT

TDQS

C2.9/5.0

Scored across 72 tools

Disambiguation2/5

Multiple tool families overlap heavily: get_dependencies/get_dependents/get_change_impact/get_full_context/get_edit_context all analyze symbol relationships; search_codebase/search_in_symbols/ts_search all search code; memory_search/reasoning_search/capture_search all search stores. Descriptions help somewhat, but boundaries remain unclear and agents must memorize subtle distinctions to avoid misselection.

Naming Consistency4/5

Nearly all tools use snake_case with predictable verb_noun patterns and consistent family prefixes (get_, memory_, capture_, reasoning_, ts_, corpus_). Minor deviations like 'checkpoint' (noun-only) and 'reindex' are readable but slightly inconsistent.

Tool Count1/5

72 tools is far beyond the typical 3-15 range and meets the rubric's extreme mismatch threshold. Even for a broad code-intelligence platform, this creates an overwhelming selection burden and increases the chance of wrong tool choice.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers code navigation, editing, refactoring, dependency analysis, git status, diagnostics, memory, reasoning, captures, and project management comprehensively. Only minor gaps exist, such as dedicated file creation/deletion and git commit/push operations, but major workflows are supported.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessWithin a week