token-savior
Related Servers
Alternatives to token-savior
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables Large Language Models to interact with Git repositories through a robust API, supporting operations like repository initialization, cloning, file staging, committing, and branch management.282,535 npm242Apache 2.0
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides structure-aware code analysis (symbol trees, dependencies, docs) to reduce AI agent token consumption by up to 99%, along with Git commit intelligence.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides semantic code intelligence by pre-indexing codebases, enabling AI agents to query symbol relationships and code structure directly, reducing costs and tool calls.128,535 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that indexes codebases into a local graph and provides on-demand context retrieval for AI coding agents, reducing token usage by tracking session history and delivering only relevant code subgraphs.7 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for local-first code intelligence, providing structural code graph, semantic search, and impact analysis to AI agents.2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server for efficient code indexing and symbol retrieval using tree-sitter AST parsing to fetch specific functions or classes without loading entire files. It significantly reduces AI token costs by providing O(1) byte-offset access to code components across multiple programming languages.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides ultra-efficient code exploration through AST analysis, reducing LLM token usage by up to 95% while enabling instant call graph generation and dependency analysis for massive codebases.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 72 tools
Multiple tool families overlap heavily: get_dependencies/get_dependents/get_change_impact/get_full_context/get_edit_context all analyze symbol relationships; search_codebase/search_in_symbols/ts_search all search code; memory_search/reasoning_search/capture_search all search stores. Descriptions help somewhat, but boundaries remain unclear and agents must memorize subtle distinctions to avoid misselection.
Nearly all tools use snake_case with predictable verb_noun patterns and consistent family prefixes (get_, memory_, capture_, reasoning_, ts_, corpus_). Minor deviations like 'checkpoint' (noun-only) and 'reindex' are readable but slightly inconsistent.
72 tools is far beyond the typical 3-15 range and meets the rubric's extreme mismatch threshold. Even for a broad code-intelligence platform, this creates an overwhelming selection burden and increases the chance of wrong tool choice.
The surface covers code navigation, editing, refactoring, dependency analysis, git status, diagnostics, memory, reasoning, captures, and project management comprehensively. Only minor gaps exist, such as dedicated file creation/deletion and git commit/push operations, but major workflows are supported.