Skip to main content
Glama
MementoRC

MCP Git Server

by MementoRC

git_init

Initialize a new Git repository by specifying the path to set up version control for your project using the MCP Git Server.

Instructions

Initialize a new Git repository

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
repo_pathYes

Implementation Reference

  • The core handler function that implements the git_init tool logic: initializes a new Git repository at the specified path using dulwich Repo.init().
    def git_init(repo_path: str) -> str:
        """Initialize new Git repository"""
        try:
            path = Path(repo_path)
            path.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
    
            # Initialize repository
            Repo.init(path)
    
            return f"✅ Initialized empty Git repository in {repo_path}"
    
        except Exception as e:
            return f"❌ Init failed: {str(e)}"
  • Pydantic input schema for the git_init tool, defining the required repo_path parameter.
    class GitInit(BaseModel):
        repo_path: str
  • ToolDefinition registration in the central ToolRegistry for the git_init tool (name="git_init"), linking schema and initial placeholder handler.
    ToolDefinition(
        name=GitTools.INIT,
        category=ToolCategory.GIT,
        description="Initialize a new Git repository",
        schema=GitInit,
        handler=placeholder_handler,
        requires_repo=False,  # Special case
    ),
  • Registration of the wrapped git_init handler in the git_handlers dictionary using special _create_git_init_handler (no repo required).
    "git_init": self._create_git_init_handler(git_init),
  • Helper function to create a special wrapper handler for git_init, which extracts repo_path from kwargs and calls the core func (since it doesn't require a Repo object).
    def _create_git_init_handler(self, func):
        """Special handler for git_init which doesn't need a repo object"""
    
        def handler(**kwargs):
            repo_path = kwargs["repo_path"]
            return func(repo_path)
    
        return handler
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. While 'Initialize' implies a write operation, it doesn't specify what exactly gets created (.git directory, default branch), whether it's idempotent, what happens if the path isn't empty, or what permissions are required. This leaves significant behavioral gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is perfectly concise - a single sentence that directly states the tool's purpose without any unnecessary words. It's front-loaded with the essential information and wastes no space.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool that creates a repository (a significant write operation) with no annotations, no output schema, and undocumented parameters, the description is insufficient. It doesn't cover behavioral aspects, parameter details, or expected outcomes, leaving the agent with inadequate context for proper usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage for the single parameter 'repo_path', the description provides no additional parameter information. It doesn't explain what 'repo_path' represents (e.g., absolute/relative path, must exist, must be empty), leaving the parameter's meaning and constraints undocumented.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Initialize') and resource ('new Git repository'), making the purpose immediately understandable. However, it doesn't differentiate this tool from its siblings (like git_clone or git_remote_add), which would require a perfect score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There's no mention of prerequisites (e.g., needing an empty directory), when not to use it (e.g., on existing repositories), or how it relates to sibling tools like git_clone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Related Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/MementoRC/mcp-git'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server