Skip to main content
Glama

init

Initialize a new Git repository by specifying an absolute path for setup, enabling enhanced Git operations via the Git MCP Server for streamlined version control.

Instructions

Initialize a new Git repository

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pathNoPath to initialize the repository in. MUST be an absolute path (e.g., /Users/username/projects/my-repo)

Implementation Reference

  • Primary handler for the 'init' tool. Validates path, executes 'git init' command, handles caching/invalidation, error handling, and returns formatted result.
    static async init(options: InitOptions, context: GitToolContext): Promise<GitToolResult> {
      const path = this.getPath(options);
      return await this.executeOperation(
        context.operation,
        path,
        async () => {
          const pathInfo = PathValidator.validatePath(path, { mustExist: false, allowDirectory: true });
          const result = await CommandExecutor.executeGitCommand(
            'init',
            context.operation,
            pathInfo
          );
    
          return {
            content: [{
              type: 'text',
              text: `Repository initialized successfully\n${CommandExecutor.formatOutput(result)}`
            }]
          };
        },
        {
          command: 'init',
          invalidateCache: true // Invalidate all caches for this repo
        }
      );
    }
  • Registers the 'init' tool with the MCP server in ListTools handler, defining name, description, and JSON input schema.
    {
      name: 'init',
      description: 'Initialize a new Git repository',
      inputSchema: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          path: {
            type: 'string',
            description: `Path to initialize the repository in. ${PATH_DESCRIPTION}`,
          },
        },
        required: [],
      },
  • Registers and dispatches 'init' tool calls in the CallTool handler by validating arguments and invoking GitOperations.init.
    case 'init': {
      const validArgs = this.validateArguments(operation, args, isInitOptions);
      return await GitOperations.init(validArgs, context);
    }
  • TypeScript interface defining input parameters for the 'init' tool.
    export interface InitOptions extends GitOptions, BasePathOptions {}
  • Type guard function for validating 'init' tool input arguments.
    export function isInitOptions(obj: any): obj is InitOptions {
      return obj && validatePath(obj.path);
    }
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. While 'Initialize' implies a write operation, it doesn't specify what exactly gets created (.git directory, initial commit), whether it overwrites existing repositories, or what permissions are required. This leaves significant behavioral gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that states the core purpose without any wasted words. It's appropriately sized for a simple tool and front-loads the essential information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter tool with good schema coverage but no annotations or output schema, the description provides the basic purpose but lacks behavioral context about what initialization entails. It's minimally adequate but leaves important questions unanswered about the tool's effects.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 100% description coverage for its single parameter, so the baseline is 3. The description doesn't add any parameter-specific information beyond what's already in the schema, but it doesn't need to compensate for gaps either.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Initialize') and resource ('a new Git repository'), making the purpose immediately understandable. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'clone' (which also creates repositories), so it doesn't reach the highest score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'clone' (for existing repositories) or prerequisites for initialization. It simply states what the tool does without contextual usage information.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Related Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Sheshiyer/git-mcp-v2'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server