get_farm_state

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It usefully explains capUnlimited semantics and that accounting assets are not guaranteed instantly redeemable, but omits permission requirements, failure modes, and whether the call is strictly read-only beyond the verb 'Read'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with the read action and fields, followed by the two important caveats. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no annotations, the description lists the returned fields (asset token, accounting assets, deposit cap) and clarifies capUnlimited and redeemability. It could be more explicit about the return structure/formats, but is nearly complete for a one-parameter read.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%: the sole address parameter is fully documented in the schema with a pattern and meaning. The description adds no parameter syntax or format details beyond restating that it must be a registered Ethereum mainnet farm address.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb (Read) and resource (a registered Ethereum mainnet farm's asset token, accounting assets, deposit cap) with the scope 'at one block'. It distinguishes from siblings like list_registered_farms and get_token_supplies by focusing on one farm's state rather than listing farms or token supplies.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implied usage for inspecting a registered mainnet farm's state. It does not explicitly state when to use this vs list_registered_farms or get_token_supplies, nor any preconditions beyond 'registered Ethereum mainnet farm'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.