Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to infiniFi MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables agents and humans to pay per question over x402 and receive plain-language answers about on-chain activity, priced by complexity before execution. Each paid request runs a live subgraph round trip to search, validate, generate and execute a GraphQL query, then synthesizes the raw results into a grounded response alongside the underlying data.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables querying on-chain data (balances, transactions, token transfers, blocks) across 20+ EVM chains through natural language.
      706 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to inspect the public NFH protocol corpus, verify census status, and prepare bounded Ethereum wallet intents for claims and non-custodial market actions while never signing or submitting transactions.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides read-only access to Solana on-chain data, enabling natural language queries for wallet balances, token holdings, prices, transactions, and more via MCP-compatible clients.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI-powered analysis of Ethereum blockchain data through semantic search, natural language queries, and structured filtering. Provides comprehensive access to addresses, transactions, blocks, tokens, and smart contracts with real-time blockchain intelligence.
      26
      7 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language querying of blockchain data, including blocks, transactions, logs, and more, powered by Cryo and Reth, with optional micropayment integration via Payflow.
      8
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action: token supplies, farm enumeration, single-farm state, and documentation index. The descriptions explicitly delineate boundaries (e.g. list_registered_farms vs get_farm_state) so an agent can select reliably.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern: get_token_supplies, list_registered_farms, get_farm_state, get_docs_index. Verb choice (get/list) maps predictably to retrieval vs enumeration.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is slightly thin but well-scoped for a read-only protocol data reader, with each tool earning its place. No redundant or filler tools, though the surface is minimal.

    Completeness3/5

    The read surface covers token supplies, farms, farm state, and docs, but lacks user-position/balance queries and yield or historical metrics that a protocol reader would typically need. These notable gaps limit deeper agent workflows without external calls.