transfer_sharepoint_to_cleyrop

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description effectively discloses key behavioral traits: the process involves downloading from SharePoint and re-uploading via SDK, uses temporary files, and handles large files without memory limits. It does not mention authentication or error handling, but given no annotations, this is strong.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is highly concise: two sentences clearly state purpose and mechanism without extraneous words. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 6 parameters (3 required) and an output schema, the description covers the core process and critical behavior (temp files, large file support). Minor gaps exist (conflict handling), but overall sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description does not add significant meaning beyond the schema; it repeats defaults but does not clarify parameter interplay or format details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the action ('copie un fichier ou un dossier') and the source/destination (SharePoint to Cleyrop). It clearly differentiates from sibling tools like sharepoint_read_file (read-only) and sharepoint_list_folder (listing).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for transferring files/folders but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like sharepoint_read_file. No direct guidance on prerequisites or when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.