wattpad_create_story

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond annotations, the description reveals key runtime behavior: the tool hits a specific router, returns 204 without a body, does not return the story id, and requires a follow-up lookup. This materially changes how an agent should consume the result and is exactly the kind of context annotations cannot convey.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact, front-loaded with the main purpose, and each caveat (router, 204, missing ID, follow-up lookup, tags) earns its place. The 'Returns' line is the only slightly redundant piece, but it clarifies the dry_run behavior.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the annotations, complete schema coverage, and an output schema, the description supplies the missing operational context an agent needs: how to obtain the created story's ID and what to set before publishing. Nothing essential is omitted.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents every parameter with 100% coverage, including the tag requirement and dry_run semantics. The description reinforces the tag rule but does not add meaningful parameter-level detail beyond the schema, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'Crea una historia nueva y vacía', naming the exact action and resource. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like wattpad_create_part, which target parts rather than whole stories.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It provides actionable routing and workflow guidance: use the new front router, expect a 204 with no body, and later locate the story via wattpad_list_my_works. It also advises adding at least one tag to enable publishing. It does not explicitly state exclusions or compare against alternative creation tools, so it falls just short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.