madeonsol_first_touch_subscriptions_delete

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true. The description adds 'permanently' which confirms irreversibility, but this does not add substantial new behavioral context beyond the annotations. It does not mention error handling, return values, or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise with two short sentences. It front-loads the purpose and adds a restriction. No fluff or redundant information; every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a destructive operation with no output schema, the description is too minimal. It omits critical context such as success confirmation, failure modes (e.g., subscription not found), or any undo capability. The agent may not know what to expect after invoking the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with the parameter 'id' described as 'Subscription UUID'. The description does not add any additional meaning or constraints beyond the schema, so it provides no extra value. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Delete'), the resource ('first-touch subscription'), and the effect ('permanently'). It also specifies a restriction ('ULTRA only'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like create, get, list, and update. The verb and target are unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides implicit context with 'ULTRA only' but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., update). No guidance on prerequisites or conditions for deletion is given. It fails to help the agent decide between deleting and other actions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.