madeonsol_coordination_alerts_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds behavioral context beyond annotations: firing latency (~1s), delivery methods (WebSocket channel and HMAC-signed webhook), and the one-time return of webhook_secret. Annotations indicate write operation but non-destructive. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences with no wasted words, front-loading the purpose and adding essential behavioral details efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 9 parameters, no required ones, and no output schema, the description covers key aspects: creation, firing condition, delivery, and return value. Missing error cases but acceptable given output schema absence.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with all parameters described. The description adds context on overall behavior (peak-density scoring) but does not significantly enhance per-parameter meaning beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a coordination alert rule, specifies firing condition (KOL cluster meets thresholds within ~1s), delivery methods (WebSocket and/or webhook), and return of webhook_secret. It distinguishes from sibling alert tools like price_alerts_create and coordination_alerts_update.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for setting up KOL coordination alerts with thresholds, but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this vs alternatives like price_alerts_create or first_touch_subscriptions_create. However, for a creation tool, the context is fairly clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.