Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Blackveil DNS

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables DNS and email security analysis through passive and active scanning capabilities. Provides comprehensive domain security checks including SPF, DMARC, DNSSEC validation, MX record analysis, and SMTP connectivity testing.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables assessing and comparing domains for email spoofing risk by evaluating SPF, DMARC, MX, and DKIM records from public DNS, providing A-F grades and concrete remediation steps.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that checks SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and MX records for a domain, returning a health verdict and specific DNS fixes to improve email deliverability.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive tools for real-time DNS queries across 53 record types, global propagation checks, and SSL certificate analysis. It also enables domain security scans for SPF/DKIM/DMARC configurations and HTTP uptime monitoring.
      8
      42 npm
      22
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An advanced email security analysis MCP server for real-time phishing detection, comprehensive header analysis, and threat intelligence integration. It enables users to extract indicators of compromise and validate email authentication protocols like DKIM, SPF, and DMARC.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 80 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a clearly scoped purpose with detailed descriptions, and async variants follow obvious start/status/findings patterns. However, similar-sounding pairs like check_rbl/check_mx_reputation and check_dane/check_dane_https rely on descriptions to avoid mis-selection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most security checks use a consistent check_* prefix, and async workflows follow a predictable _start/_status/_findings convention. Some verbs vary (get_, assess_, map_, simulate_) and a few tools like generate or resolve_spf_chain don't fit a uniform pattern, but the overall structure is coherent.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 80 tools, this is far beyond typical MCP server scope and creates significant selection overhead. While the domain is broad and many tools are async wrappers, the sheer number risks overwhelming agents and diluting clarity.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full lifecycle: individual DNS/email checks, comprehensive scans, async batch operations, brand audits, OSINT investigations, compliance mapping, remediation generation, and drift tracking. There are no obvious dead ends or missing critical operations for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive