Blackveil DNS
Related Servers
Alternatives to Blackveil DNS
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables DNS and email security analysis through passive and active scanning capabilities. Provides comprehensive domain security checks including SPF, DMARC, DNSSEC validation, MX record analysis, and SMTP connectivity testing.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that enumerates DNS records, detects SPF/DMARC/DKIM misconfigurations, and identifies dangling subdomains.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables assessing and comparing domains for email spoofing risk by evaluating SPF, DMARC, MX, and DKIM records from public DNS, providing A-F grades and concrete remediation steps.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server that checks SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and MX records for a domain, returning a health verdict and specific DNS fixes to improve email deliverability.1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceProvides comprehensive tools for real-time DNS queries across 53 record types, global propagation checks, and SSL certificate analysis. It also enables domain security scans for SPF/DKIM/DMARC configurations and HTTP uptime monitoring.842 npm22Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn advanced email security analysis MCP server for real-time phishing detection, comprehensive header analysis, and threat intelligence integration. It enables users to extract indicators of compromise and validate email authentication protocols like DKIM, SPF, and DMARC.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 80 tools
Each tool has a clearly scoped purpose with detailed descriptions, and async variants follow obvious start/status/findings patterns. However, similar-sounding pairs like check_rbl/check_mx_reputation and check_dane/check_dane_https rely on descriptions to avoid mis-selection.
Most security checks use a consistent check_* prefix, and async workflows follow a predictable _start/_status/_findings convention. Some verbs vary (get_, assess_, map_, simulate_) and a few tools like generate or resolve_spf_chain don't fit a uniform pattern, but the overall structure is coherent.
With 80 tools, this is far beyond typical MCP server scope and creates significant selection overhead. While the domain is broad and many tools are async wrappers, the sheer number risks overwhelming agents and diluting clarity.
The tool surface covers the full lifecycle: individual DNS/email checks, comprehensive scans, async batch operations, brand audits, OSINT investigations, compliance mapping, remediation generation, and drift tracking. There are no obvious dead ends or missing critical operations for the stated purpose.