sub_page_configs_list

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds only "all", which at best hints at unpaginated retrieval, and says nothing about result size, ordering, or rate limits beyond what the structured fields already convey.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short clause with zero filler, and the essential information (list, subscription page configs) is front-loaded. Nothing could be removed without losing meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description carries some burden to indicate what a list call returns, but it does not describe the shape of a config entry, ordering, or whether the list is bounded. Annotations cover the read-only safety aspect, so the gap is moderate rather than severe.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description contributes nothing further because there is nothing parameter-related to clarify.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

"Get all subscription page configs" states a specific verb (get all) and resource (subscription page configs), and the plural/"all" wording distinguishes it from the singular sub_page_configs_get sibling. It does not explicitly name that sibling or note the list-vs-single relationship, so it stops short of full differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no statement of when to use this versus sub_page_configs_get or the other sub_page_configs_* siblings, and no mention of whether pagination, sorting, or filtering applies. The agent is left to infer usage purely from the name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.