Skip to main content
Glama

snippets_create

Create a named snippet for reuse in Remnawave VPN panel configurations. Provide a name and snippet array to add reusable configuration data.

Instructions

Create snippet

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYes
snippetYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv3.0.0

TDQS

D1.3/5.0
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, so the write/safe profile is carried by structured data. The description adds nothing beyond that — no side effects, no name-collision behavior, no sync implications for a snippet that may be pushed to nodes.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two words are certainly brief, but this is under-specification rather than conciseness — no information is front-loaded because no information exists beyond the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a required-parameter write tool with no output schema and opaque inputs, the description supplies nothing an agent needs: no parameter meaning, no behavioral context, no relation to sibling snippet operations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% for both required parameters. The description gives no meaning for 'name' (naming rules, path-like pattern usage) or the opaque 'snippet' array of open objects, and does not compensate for the coverage gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

"Create snippet" only restates the tool name in verb+resource form with no scope, no mention of what a snippet is in this API (config snippet presumably), and no differentiation from siblings like snippets_update or snippets_sync. It is essentially a tautology of the name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to create a snippet versus updating, syncing, or reusing an existing one, and no prerequisites or context. The sibling set contains snippets_list/update/sync/delete, yet none are referenced.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools