connectsecure-mcp
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@connectsecure-mcplist all critical vulnerabilities"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
connectsecure-mcp
MCP server for ConnectSecure — a vulnerability management / IT security assessment platform. Exposes ConnectSecure's read-only query API (companies, assets, vulnerabilities, Active Directory, firewall, compliance, credentials, and more) as MCP tools.
Overview
Stateless HTTP service. No credentials are ever persisted — each request supplies its own credentials via headers, used only for the lifetime of that single request.
Supports concurrent requests; per-request credential isolation is done via Python
contextvars, not a global/shared client instance.Entry points:
POST /mcp(MCP protocol) andGET /health(health check).Default port:
8080(configurable viaMCP_HTTP_PORT).
Related MCP server: LegacyMCP
Scope
19 read-only (GET) tools, trimmed twice: first from an initial
285-tool full-API build down to 50 tools (to stay under Vertex AI/Gemini's
512-function-declaration ceiling across all loaded MCP servers), then
again on 2026-08-04 down to 19 tools per the "actual usage + minimal
same-category CRUD" scope decision applied across this program's MCP
fleet.
The 2026-08-04 trim confirmed all 11 endpoints MSPbots' own production
integration actually calls (via web/int/sys/integration/api/list
against integration id 2008424422784020481):
vulnerabilities_details, external_asset_vulnerabilities,
remediate_records, asset_critical_vulnerabilities, asset_view,
sw_problems_remediations_view (all asset); azure_secure_score,
ad_users_view, ad_password_policies (all active_directory);
companies/company (company); users (users). Every one of those
is kept, plus a small amount of same-category padding for baseline
visibility:
asset(9 of the prior 18): the 6 actually-used tools above, plusassets(base list),asset_stats,risk_score.active_directory(6 of the prior 22): the 3 actually-used tools above, plusad_basic_info,ad_domain_details,ad_groups_view.company(3 of the prior 9):companies,companies_by_id,company_stats.users(1, unchanged):get_users.
Cut entirely on 2026-08-04 (available in the prior 50-tool build but
not exposed here): the other 16 asset tools (asset_software,
asset_users, distinct_os, distinct_platform,
total_asset_count, vulnerabilities_count, problems_summary,
get_asset_remediation_plan, remediation_plan_global), the other 16
active_directory tools (computers/GPOs/groups/OUs/roles detail views,
Azure AD logs/licenses, user licenses/details), and the other 6 company
tools (adaudit, asset_windows_compatibility, event_tickets,
jobs_view + jobs_view_by_id).
Cut in the earlier 285→50 pass (still not exposed here — see Known
Gaps for the full accounting): Asset Data (33, field-level machine
detail), Vulnerabilities category (22, overlapped with the vulnerability
summaries kept in Asset), Compliance (10), Reports (7), Firewall (12),
Application Baseline (8), Integration (6), Ad Audit, Agent, Attack
Surface, Tags, Credentials, Discovery Settings, Compliance Assessment,
Backup Software, EDR, Event Set, External Scan, Jobs, Patch Management,
PII, Scheduler, Settings, Ticket Template (2-4 each, mostly
administrative/config endpoints). Write operations (POST/PATCH/
DELETE, ~78 of them) were never in scope in either pass. If a removed
tool is needed later, the vendor's Swagger spec (linked below) still
documents it and it can be re-added the same way the kept tools were
generated.
Authentication
ConnectSecure is multi-tenant: every tenant is provisioned on its own pod
hostname (e.g. https://pod1.connectsecure.com), and auth is a JWT access
token obtained out-of-band via:
POST {base_url}/w/authorize
Client-Auth-Token: base64(tenant_name + "+" + client_id + ":" + client_secret)(Note the literal + between tenant_name and client_id — confirmed against
both ConnectSecure's own Swagger description and MSPbots' real implementation
in autointegration's ConnectSecureAuth.java; easy to miss since the
Swagger text renders it ambiguously as "tenant+client_id".)
which returns {"data": {"access_token": "...", "user_id": "..."}}. This
server does not perform that exchange itself — like the other OAuth2-based
vendor MCPs in this program (Acronis, ConnectWise Asio, Bloom Growth), it only
receives the already-obtained access token (plus the user id and pod
hostname) via request headers, and forwards them upstream as
Authorization: Bearer <token> and X-USER-ID: <user_id> on every call.
HEADER 授权参数说明
Header | 类型 | 是否必填 | 默认值 | 枚举值 | 字段描述 | Example |
| string | 是 | 无 | 无 |
|
|
| string | 是 | 无 | 无 | 同一次 |
|
| string | 是 | 无 | 无 | 该租户的 ConnectSecure pod 主机名(每个租户独立,不固定) |
|
Missing any of the three headers returns 401:
{
"error": "Missing credentials",
"message": "This server requires the X-ConnectSecure-Access-Token, X-ConnectSecure-User-Id, and X-ConnectSecure-Base-Url headers",
"required_headers": ["X-ConnectSecure-Access-Token", "X-ConnectSecure-User-Id", "X-ConnectSecure-Base-Url"],
"optional_headers": []
}Environment Variables
Variable | 类型 | 是否必填 | 默认值 | 说明 |
| int | 否 |
| HTTP 监听端口 |
| string | 否 |
| HTTP 监听地址 |
(No *_BASE_URL env var — the pod hostname is per-tenant and always supplied
via the X-ConnectSecure-Base-Url header, never a fixed default.)
MCP Endpoint
POST /mcp— MCP protocol (streamable HTTP transport)GET /health— health check, returns{"status": "ok", "service": "connectsecure-mcp", "transport": "http"}
Tool List
Every list-style tool shares the same optional pagination/filter params —
condition (a ConnectSecure query-condition string), skip, limit,
order_by — in addition to whatever's listed below. Get-by-id tools take a
single required id path parameter. Several report/detail tools additionally
require a company_id (get it from connectsecure_get_company_companies)
and/or an object_guid/asset_id (get it from the corresponding list tool
first).
Category | Tool | Description | Params |
active_directory |
| Retrieve ad basic info. | company_id, source, condition?, skip?, limit?, order_by? |
active_directory |
| Retrieve ad domain details. | company_id, source, condition?, skip?, limit?, order_by? |
active_directory |
| Retrieve ad groups view. | condition?, skip?, limit?, order_by? |
active_directory |
| Retrieve ad password policies. | condition?, skip?, limit?, order_by? |
active_directory |
| Retrieve ad users view. | condition?, skip?, limit?, order_by? |
active_directory |
| Retrieve azure secure score. | condition?, skip?, limit?, order_by? |
asset |
| Retrieve records. | condition?, skip?, limit?, order_by? |
asset |
| Retrieve asset stats. | condition?, skip?, limit?, order_by? |
asset |
| Retrieve asset view. | condition?, skip?, limit?, order_by? |
asset |
| Retrieve assets. | condition?, skip?, limit?, order_by? |
asset |
| Retrieve records. | condition?, skip?, limit?, order_by? |
asset |
| Retrieve records. | condition?, skip?, limit?, order_by? |
asset |
| Retrieve records. | condition?, skip?, limit?, order_by? |
asset |
| Retrieve records. | condition?, skip?, limit?, order_by? |
asset |
| Retrieve records. | condition?, skip?, limit?, order_by? |
company |
| Retrieve companies. | condition?, skip?, limit?, order_by? |
company |
| Retrieve company. | id |
company |
| Retrieve company stats. | condition?, skip?, limit?, order_by? |
users |
| Retrieve Users. | condition?, skip?, limit?, order_by? |
测试示例
# Health check
curl -s http://localhost:8080/health
# Call a tool via the MCP protocol (streamable HTTP) — requires an
# initialize handshake first per the MCP spec; abbreviated example below
# shows the tool-call request body only:
curl -s -X POST http://localhost:8080/mcp -H "X-ConnectSecure-Access-Token: <jwt-access-token>" -H "X-ConnectSecure-User-Id: <user-id>" -H "X-ConnectSecure-Base-Url: https://pod1.connectsecure.com" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -H "Accept: application/json, text/event-stream" -H "mcp-session-id: <session-id-from-initialize>" -d '{
"jsonrpc": "2.0",
"id": 1,
"method": "tools/call",
"params": {
"name": "connectsecure_get_company_companies",
"arguments": {}
}
}'Expected: 200 with the companies list on a valid token; 401/403
(surfaced by the tool as Error: ConnectSecure API error 401/403: ...) on an
invalid or expired token.
Live self-test against a real account: passed. Using a real
access_token/user_id/pod for tenant mspbots (pod pod107), called
through the running MCP server end-to-end:
connectsecure_get_users_get_users→ returned 11 real user records.connectsecure_get_company_companies→ returned the real company (id: 11939,mspbots.ai,internal_scan: false).connectsecure_get_active_directory_ad_basic_info,connectsecure_get_active_directory_ad_users_view,connectsecure_get_asset_assets,connectsecure_get_asset_vulnerabilities_details→ all returned{"status": true, "total": 0}(genuine empty result, not an error). Cross-checked against the two non-empty calls above: since the same auth/parsing path returns real data for users/companies, the zero counts for AD/asset/vulnerability endpoints reflect this test tenant havinginternal_scan: false(no on-prem scan agent deployed) — nothing has been scanned yet — not a broken pipeline or masked auth failure.Client-Auth-Tokenformat correction: the initial/w/authorizeattempt (base64 oftenant_name+client_id+:+client_secret, no separator betweentenant_nameandclient_id) got a real403from ConnectSecure. This was first (wrongly) suspected to mean the providedclient_secretwas still MSPbots-internal ciphertext (it base64-decodes to agAAAAA...-prefixed string, the signature of a Pythoncryptography.fernettoken). That hypothesis was disproved by checking the real implementation in MSPbots'autointegrationrepo (client/src/main/java/mspbots/integration/client/core/auth/impl/ConnectSecureAuth.java): the actual formula inserts a literal+betweentenant_nameandclient_id—base64(tenant_name + "+" + client_id + ":" + client_secret)— and usesclient_secretcompletely as-is, with no decryption step anywhere in that codebase. Rebuilding the token with the literal+included, using the exact same (unmodified)client_secretvalue, got a real200from/w/authorizewith a validaccess_token. So theclient_secretwas fine all along; the bug was purely in the test script's string concatenation, not in ConnectSecure, MSPbots' credential storage, or this MCP server (which never performs the/w/authorizeexchange itself — see Authentication).
API Reference
Swagger UI: https://pod102.myconnectsecure.com/apidocs/ (spec:
https://pod102.myconnectsecure.com/apidocs/swagger.yaml) — public, no login required. Each tenant's own pod hosts the identical spec.Overview / auth docs: see
/w/authorize(tagAuth) in the spec above.
Known Gaps
Trimmed twice. First from 285 to 50 tools, by explicit user decision, after the full 285-tool build tripped the platform's aggregate MCP function-declaration ceiling (Vertex AI/Gemini caps a single model call at 512 function declarations across all loaded MCP servers) — see below for what that pass cut. Then again on 2026-08-04, from 50 to 19 tools, per the "actual usage + minimal same-category CRUD" scope decision applied across this program's MCP fleet — kept the 11 endpoints MSPbots' own production integration actually calls plus light same-category padding; cut the rest of what had been "full category" Active Directory/Company and the broader 18-tool Asset set down further. See Scope for the exact breakdown of both passes. Any removed tool can be re-added on request if a real use case needs it — the vendor's Swagger spec (linked below) still documents its exact shape.
285→50 pass cut entirely: Asset Data, the standalone Vulnerabilities category, Compliance, Reports, Firewall, Application Baseline, Integration, and a long tail of small administrative/config categories (Ad Audit, Agent, Attack Surface, Tags, Credentials, Discovery Settings, Compliance Assessment, Backup Software, EDR, Event Set, External Scan, Jobs, Patch Management, PII, Scheduler, Settings, Ticket Template).
Read-only scope, by explicit user decision (unchanged from the original build): the ~78
POST/PATCH/DELETEwrite operations (create/update/delete company mappings, credentials, discovery settings, tags, scheduler jobs, etc.) were never implemented — can be added on request.company_id/object_guid/asset_idare not auto-resolved — many Active Directory / Asset Data / Compliance tools require one of these IDs as input; call the corresponding list tool (e.g.connectsecure_get_company_companies,connectsecure_get_asset_asset_view) first to obtain it.Response field shapes are whatever the vendor's Swagger spec documents — not independently re-verified per endpoint beyond the schema-validity check (no bare arrays without
items, confirmed with a script againsttools/listoutput).
This server cannot be installed
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP server for vulnerability management that provides tools for automated severity and CWE classification using NLP models. It enables AI agents to query the Vulnerability Lookup API for detailed CVE information and search for security vulnerabilities across various sources.1634AGPL 3.0
- Alicense-qualityAmaintenanceMCP server that enables AI-powered assessment of Active Directory on-premises environments by exposing AD data as queryable tools for LLMs like Claude.MIT
- AlicenseDqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that exposes the Vicarius vRx External Data API to AI assistants, providing 88 tools across 37 API domains for managing vulnerabilities, endpoints, patches, and more, with read-only safety enforcement.891MIT
- Flicense-qualityCmaintenanceA production-style MCP server providing AI models with cybersecurity tools including port scanning, WHOIS, DNS, threat intelligence, CVE lookup, and more.
Related MCP Connectors
Official Microsoft MCP Server to query Microsoft Entra data using natural language
MCP server for Pentest-Tools.com: run scans, manage findings and reports via your preffered LLM.
Security scanner for MCP servers. Detect vulnerabilities, prompt injection, and tool poisoning.
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/MSPbotsAI/connectsecure-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server