Skip to main content
Glama
MCPJam

MCP Specification Server

by MCPJam
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Specification Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • mcp-advisor

      olaservo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides comprehensive access to the Model Context Protocol specification through prompts and resources, enabling evaluation of server compliance and detailed explanations of MCP topics.
      5 npm
      25
      MIT

    • Swagger/OpenAPI MCP Server

      gulbaki
      A
      license
      D
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to explore and interact with API specifications by providing tools for loading, browsing, and getting detailed information about API endpoints.
      4
      10 npm
      14
      ISC

    • @shuji-bonji/pdf-spec-mcp

      shuji-bonji
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that provides structured access to ISO 32000 (PDF) specification documents. Enables LLMs to navigate, search, and analyze PDF specifications through well-defined tools.
      8
      34 npm
      2
      MIT
    • Specifai MCP Server by presidio-oss

      Specifai MCP Serverofficial

      presidio-oss
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Specifai project integration and automation with any MCP-compatible AI tool. This server currently exposes tools to read all documents generated by the Specifai project.
      4 npm
      13
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion between tools, so disambiguation is perfect.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name follows a clear pattern (prefix_verb_noun) and is internally consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool is borderline thin for a server; while it may be sufficient for a simple search utility, typical specification servers offer more operations.

    Completeness2/5

    The server only provides search, missing obvious operations like retrieving specific sections or listing contents, making the toolset incomplete for comprehensive specification interaction.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources