Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to max-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients and AI assistants to inspect and modify a live Autodesk 3ds Max session — reading the selection, querying objects and layers, capturing the viewport, and running MAXScript or Python in the open scene. Every request is logged and each scene change becomes a named undo record, so the AI can only undo its own steps and the user can audit and reverse everything.
      10
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to control a live 3ds Max session directly, including creating and editing objects, materials, animation, and scene inspection, with undo support.
      17
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to directly control Autodesk 3ds Max through natural language to create models, set materials, adjust lighting, and automate animations. It bridges the Model Context Protocol with 3ds Max via a TCP socket to execute Python and MAXScript commands.
      24
      18
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to connect to Autodesk 3ds Max via the Model Context Protocol, allowing natural-language control of scene creation, modeling, materials, viewport capture, and plugin introspection through dedicated MCP tools.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to directly control Autodesk 3ds Max for modeling, shading, rigging, animation, rendering, baking, and engine export through MCP.
      375
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Connect AI agents to Autodesk 3ds Max through the Model Context Protocol, enabling natural language control of scene creation, materials, modifiers, rendering, and plugin workflows.
      253 PyPI
      348
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 15 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools map to clearly distinct resources/actions (get_object vs query_objects vs scene_summary vs create/delete/set_property), and descriptions explicitly state when to prefer one over another. The overlap is concentrated in the introspection cluster (max_api, max_api_search, max_check, max_doc) and the two execution engines (max_eval vs max_python); the prose disambiguates them, but an agent could still pick the wrong one for 'does this exist' questions.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Every tool uses a uniform max_ prefix with snake_case, which makes the set instantly recognizable. The only deviation is naming style: some tools are verb_noun (query_objects, get_object, set_property, create_object) while others are bare nouns (status, screenshot, file_io, scene_summary, doc), which slightly weakens predictability without being confusing.

    Tool Count4/5

    Fifteen tools sits at the upper bound of a well-scoped set, and for a full DCC bridge with introspection, scene CRUD, and screenshotting this is defensible. There is mild redundancy: geometry import is exposed both as max_create_object kind="import" and as max_file_io action="import", which is one tool too many for that operation.

    Completeness4/5

    Read (query/get/summary), write (create/set_property/delete), file I/O, and visual verification are all covered, plus max_eval/max_python as a genuine escape hatch. Gaps remain for common workflows — no modifier add/remove, no material assignment, no animation/keyframe tools, no scene save/open, and no selection manipulation — but the escape hatches let an agent work around all of these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues