get_file_permissions
Retrieve file permissions by file ID to see who can view, comment, or edit the file.
Instructions
Get permissions for a file
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| fileId | Yes | ID of the file to get permissions for |
Retrieve file permissions by file ID to see who can view, comment, or edit the file.
Get permissions for a file
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| fileId | Yes | ID of the file to get permissions for |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It does not specify what permissions are returned (e.g., list of users, roles), or if it requires specific auth scopes.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words, efficient and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema, the description should hint at the return format (e.g., list of permissions). It does not, leaving the agent to guess.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the description does not add meaning beyond what the schema provides for `fileId`. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'permissions for a file', which is clear but does not differentiate from sibling tool `share_file` that also deals with permissions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like `share_file` or `get_file`. The description lacks context on prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Longtran2404/mcp-google-drive'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server