Skip to main content
Glama
LiskinLabs

KUKA KRL MCP Server

by LiskinLabs

Related Servers

Alternatives to KUKA KRL MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to automate CODESYS V3 PLC development, including project editing, builds, library and alarm management, online variable read/write/force operations, and CODESYS documentation search via MCP.
      3
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to connect to Allen-Bradley, Siemens, and CODESYS PLC projects for discovering, asking questions about, analyzing, and proposing code changes, with access to live tag values and version exports under permission-scoped controls.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with B\&R Automation Studio projects by building code, running ARsim simulators, and reading or writing OPC UA variables. It facilitates industrial automation development and real-time variable integration through natural language commands.
      15
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to control Universal Robots through real-time connection management, status monitoring, and precise joint/linear motion control. Provides safe robot operation with built-in collision detection and simulation mode for development without physical hardware.
      6
      GPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 12 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a discernible scope: lookups (system vars, KSS messages), syntax reference, snippet lint, workspace diagnostics, safety audit, repair, and telemetry are textually distinct. The only mild overlap is in the static-analysis family (krl_lint_snippet vs krl_workspace_diagnostics vs krl_deep_safety_audit), but descriptions clearly separate offline-snippet, project-wide, and motion/payload-safety concerns.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All 12 tools share the krl_ prefix and snake_case formatting with descriptive multi-word suffixes, giving a predictable namespace. There is a minor style split between verb-first names (krl_read_file, krl_lint_snippet, krl_lookup_*) and noun-phrase names (krl_syntax_reference, krl_control_flow, krl_live_telemetry), but readability and consistency remain high.

    Tool Count5/5

    Twelve tools is a well-scoped set for a KRL development/assistant server, with each tool covering a distinct capability (connection, telemetry, references, analysis, repair, workspace access). No filler or redundant tools are apparent.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core read/analyze/repair lifecycle plus live controller telemetry and reference lookups, which is broad for the domain. Gaps remain: there is no write/save-file or create-program tool (krl_safe_auto_repair only returns repaired text), and no cross-workspace symbol search, but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues