reopen_projects

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description adds some behavioral context (array-based, unified response with counts and per-item errors) but doesn't disclose side effects, permissions, or conditions like project state requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, front-loaded with purpose, no unnecessary words. Each sentence adds distinct information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description covers purpose, interface, and response format. Lacks explicit prerequisites or permission info but sufficient given complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for 'items' and 'projectId'. Description adds value by explaining batch vs single-item behavior and the response structure (items array, counts, per-item errors).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb 'reopen' and resource 'closed projects', and specifies it's array-based. Distinguishes from siblings like close_projects by noting single-item and batch use same interface.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool over alternatives (e.g., reopen_boards, reopen_milestones). Does not mention prerequisites like projects must be closed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.