Silenciar o activar pista

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate idempotentHint=true and readOnlyHint=false, and the description adds 'y verifica la lectura posterior' (verifies subsequent reading), providing extra behavioral context beyond annotations. However, this verification behavior is vague and could confuse an agent about expected side effects or return values.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that front-loads the main action. It avoids unnecessary wording and earns its place despite being brief.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's low complexity, output schema, and annotations, the description is minimally adequate but lacks crucial context such as when to use it, what 'verifica la lectura posterior' means, and any side effects like track state changes. The ambiguous verification phrase leaves the agent without enough information to confidently invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% schema description coverage and the description provides no parameter-level details. The phrase 'el mute de una pista' loosely maps to the 'muted' and 'track_guid' parameters, but 'project_ref' is not explained, and boolean semantics are not clarified.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses the specific verb 'Cambia' (changes) with the resource 'pista' (track) and property 'mute', clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like set_track_pan and set_track_volume. The title confirms the action of muting/unmuting a track.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as apply_track_mix_batch or set_track_volume. The description does not mention any prerequisites, exclusions, or context for use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.