Importar lote de audio

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds behavioral traits beyond annotations: it specifies atomicity ('una sola transacción') and verification ('verificación'), which are not captured by the provided annotations (readOnly=false, openWorld=false, idempotent=false, destructive=false). While it doesn't detail the verification mechanism or failure behavior, it does provide meaningful context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that is front-loaded with the key action ('Importa un lote de WAV') and avoids any redundancy. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a batch import operation with atomicity and verification, the description is under-specified. It lacks details on what verification entails, error handling, prerequisites, or the role of project_ref. The presence of an output schema mitigates some return-value ambiguity, but the overall context remains incomplete for such a complex operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema includes project_ref and items, but the description only hints that items are WAV audio files. With 0% schema description coverage, the description fails to explain the meaning of project_ref or the item structure, leaving significant semantic gaps for the agent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool imports a batch of WAV files as a single transaction with verification, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from the sibling import_audio by the 'lote' (batch) qualifier and the transactional behavior.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for batch imports via the word 'lote' and 'single transaction', but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives like import_audio, nor does it provide exclusions or prerequisites. Usage is implied rather than clearly guided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.