EtherCAT MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to EtherCAT MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to automate CODESYS V3 PLC development, including project editing, builds, library and alarm management, online variable read/write/force operations, and CODESYS documentation search via MCP.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceExposes 20 vehicle-security tools to AI coding agents such as Claude Code and Cursor, enabling them to send, fuzz, and analyze CAN frames, run UDS diagnostics and seed-key handshakes, simulate DoIP ECUs, and decode ISO-TP, J1939, DBC, and V2X data. Everything runs against a virtual CAN bus, so no vehicle or hardware is required.1MIT
- AlicenseCqualityAmaintenanceEnables an AI agent to drive a Beckhoff TwinCAT 3 setup end to end: read and write live PLC variables and system state over ADS, manage files and processes on the target IPC, build and edit projects through the XAE automation interface, capture and analyze long-running signal recordings, run scripted test benches and TcUnit suites, and look up the official Beckhoff Infosys documentation. Runs as a single Python process on the engineering PC with read-only, guarded, and full safety modes plus human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive operations.1711MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with B\&R Automation Studio projects by building code, running ARsim simulators, and reading or writing OPC UA variables. It facilitates industrial automation development and real-time variable integration through natural language commands.15MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI coding assistants to look up KUKA system variables and KSS alarms, lint and diagnose KRL projects, perform industrial safety audits, and read live controller telemetry from KRC4/KRC5 or virtual controllers.12MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to access structured PLC brand, IEC 61131-3 language, and code-template knowledge so they can generate IDE-specific automation code from natural-language requests.5MIT
TDQS
Scored across 12 tools
Each tool maps to a distinct resource/action (SDO vs PDO vs ESM vs diagnostics), and descriptions clarify the boundaries. Minor overlap exists between reset_error and drive_control's fault_reset action, and set_esm_state vs reset_error both touch fault/alarm clearing, but an agent can reasonably distinguish them.
Almost all tools use a clean verb_noun pattern (read_sdo, write_pdo, get_diagnostics, scan_slaves, set_esm_state). The lone outlier is drive_control, which inverts to noun_verb and slightly stands out.
12 tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range and each covers a meaningful EtherCAT operation (discovery, state machine, SDO/PDO I/O, diagnostics, drive control). No filler tools are present.
The surface covers the full master lifecycle: bus scan, topology, ESM get/set, SDO and PDO read/write, diagnostics, error reset, and CiA 402 drive control. Gaps are minor — no explicit PDO mapping/configuration write or slave EEPROM/firmware operations — but core workflows are fully supported.