Skip to main content
Glama
LaurenWeickert

Semesters MCP Server

by LaurenWeickert
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to Semesters MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Components Build MCP

      getlokiui
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI assistants with tools to grade, generate, and validate UI components against the components.build specification. Supports searching documentation, checking compliance, and generating framework-agnostic accessible components.
      11
      6 npm
      Apache 2.0

    • Education AI MCP

      CSOAI-ORG
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI-powered educational tools for teachers including lesson planning, quiz creation, student progress analysis, learning path recommendations, and rubric generation. Enables educators to automate administrative tasks and personalize learning experiences through natural language interactions.
      5
      8 npm
      98 PyPI
      MIT

    • a11y-toolkit

      kinti
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform WCAG 2.2 accessibility audits, including contrast ratio checks for color pairs and text-over-image, generate EU legal accessibility declarations, and produce aria-live monitoring snippets, all through local, multilingual tools.
      17
      1
      MIT

    • collegia-mcp

      Hmkhalla
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables teachers to use AI agents for lesson preparation, grading, and administrative tasks through tools for class averages, school resources, and assessment prompts.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 8 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct targets (UI vs activity vs protocol), but review_trauma_content and validate_engagement_safety both address trauma-related concerns, which could cause some confusion. The descriptions likely clarify the difference, but the boundaries are slightly fuzzy.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (generate_*, validate_*, review_*). The actions are clear and predictable, making it easy to understand what each tool does.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 8 tools, the server is well-scoped for its apparent purpose of generating and validating dyslexia-friendly, trauma-informed educational content. Each tool addresses a specific aspect of the workflow, and none feels redundant or unnecessary.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers generation, validation, and review for the core domain, but lacks tools for updating or managing existing activities/content. However, for a generator-focused server, the missing pieces are minor and can be worked around externally.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources