close_session
Ends an active session and persists learned skills, enabling the scheduler to improve allocation of System 1 and System 2 reasoning in future tasks.
Instructions
关闭会话并持久化技能。
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sessionId | Yes |
Ends an active session and persists learned skills, enabling the scheduler to improve allocation of System 1 and System 2 reasoning in future tasks.
关闭会话并持久化技能。
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| sessionId | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description mentions 'persist skills' but does not elaborate on side effects, whether the action is destructive, or state changes. With no annotations, more detail is needed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short but at the expense of completeness. It lacks necessary detail, making it under-specified for effective tool selection.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple schema (1 param, no output), the description still fails to provide sufficient context about session lifecycle, return values, or effects of persisting skills.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has 0% description coverage. The description does not explain what 'sessionId' represents or its format, leaving the agent to infer meaning only from the type string.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description '关闭会话并持久化技能' clearly indicates the tool closes a session and persists skills. It is a verb-resource pair that distinguishes it from siblings like 'open_session'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, conditions, or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/LZF1111/metacognitive-compute-scheduler'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server