PentestThinkingMCP
Provides structured attack path planning and step-by-step reasoning for solving Hack The Box challenges, with tool recommendations and critical path highlighting for exploit chains.
Recommends Metasploit as a tool for exploitation steps in the attack chain, particularly for known vulnerabilities like EternalBlue (CVE-2017-0144).
Click on "Install Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@PentestThinkingMCPplan attack steps for HTB machine starting with port scan"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
PentestThinkingMCP
A systematic, AI-powered penetration testing reasoning engine (MCP server) for attack path planning, CTF/HTB solving, and automated pentest workflows. Features Beam Search, MCTS, attack step scoring, and tool recommendations.
What is PentestThinkingMCP?
PentestThinkingMCP is an advanced Model Context Protocol (MCP) server designed to empower both human and AI pentesters. It provides:
Automated attack path planning using Beam Search and Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)
Step-by-step reasoning for CTFs, Hack The Box (HTB), and real-world pentests
Attack step scoring and prioritization
Tool recommendations for each step (e.g., nmap, metasploit, linpeas)
Critical path highlighting for the most promising exploit chains
Tree-based reasoning for reporting and documentation
Related MCP server: PentestThinkingMCP
Why is it special?
Brings LLMs to the next level: Transforms a normal LLM into a structured, methodical pentest planner and advisor
Automates complex reasoning: Finds multi-stage attack chains, not just single exploits
Works for CTFs, HTB, and real-world pentests: Adapts to any scenario where stepwise attack logic is needed
Bridges the gap between AI and hacking: Makes AI a true partner in offensive security
Features
Dual search strategies for attack modeling:
Beam search with configurable width (for methodical exploit chain discovery)
MCTS for complex decision spaces (for dynamic attack scenarios with unknowns)
Evidence/Vulnerability scoring and evaluation
Tree-based attack path analysis
Statistical analysis of potential attack vectors
MCP protocol compliance
How does it work?
Input:
You (or your AI) provide the current attack step/state (e.g., "Enumerate SMB on 10.10.10.10").Reasoning:
The server uses Beam Search or MCTS to explore possible next steps, scoring and prioritizing them.Output:
Returns the next best attack step, the full attack chain, recommended tool, and highlights the critical path.
Example Workflow: Solving an HTB Machine
Recon:
Input:attackStep: "Start with initial recon on 10.10.10.10"
Output:Run nmap -p- 10.10.10.10(recommended tool: nmap)Enumeration:
Input:attackStep: "Run nmap -p- 10.10.10.10"
Output:Enumerate SMB on port 445(recommended tool: enum4linux)Vulnerability Analysis:
Input:attackStep: "Enumerate SMB on port 445"
Output:Search for public SMB exploits (CVE-2017-0144)(recommended tool: searchsploit)Exploitation:
Input:attackStep: "Search for public SMB exploits (CVE-2017-0144)"
Output:Exploit SMB with EternalBlue (CVE-2017-0144)(recommended tool: metasploit)Privilege Escalation:
Input:attackStep: "Got shell as user"
Output:Run winPEAS for privilege escalation checks(recommended tool: winPEAS)Root/Flag:
Input:attackStep: "Found user.txt, need root"
Output:Check for AlwaysInstallElevated misconfiguration(recommended tool: manual investigation)
Installation
git clone https://github.com/ibrahimsaleem/PentestThinkingMCP.git
cd PentestThinkingMCP
npm install
npm run buildUsage
Add to your MCP client (Cursor, Claude Desktop, etc.) as a server:
{ "mcpServers": { "pentestthinkingMCP": { "command": "node", "args": ["path/to/pentestthinkingMCP/dist/index.js"] } } }Interact with it by sending attack steps and receiving next-step recommendations, tool suggestions, and attack path trees.
Search Strategies for Pentesting
Beam Search
Maintains a fixed-width set of the most promising attack paths or vulnerability chains.
Optimal for step-by-step exploit development and known vulnerability pattern matching.
Best for: Enumerating attack vectors, methodical vulnerability chaining, logical exploit pathfinding.
Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)
Simulation-based exploration of the potential attack surface.
Balances exploration of novel attack vectors and exploitation of known weaknesses.
Best for: Complex network penetration tests, scenarios with uncertain outcomes, advanced persistent threat (APT) simulation.
Algorithm Details
Attack Vector Selection
Beam Search: Evaluates and ranks multiple potential attack paths or exploit chains.
MCTS: Uses UCT for node selection (potential exploit steps) and random rollouts (simulating attack progression).
Evidence/Vulnerability Scoring Based On:
Likelihood of exploitability
Potential impact (CIA triad)
CVSS scores or similar metrics
Strength of connection in an attack chain (e.g., vulnerability A enables exploit B)
Process Management
Tree-based state tracking of attack progression
Statistical analysis of successful/failed simulated attack paths
Progress monitoring against pentest objectives
Use Cases
Automated vulnerability identification and chaining
Exploit pathfinding and optimization
Attack scenario simulation and "what-if" analysis
Red teaming strategy development and refinement
Assisting in manual pentesting by suggesting potential avenues
Decision tree exploration for complex attack vectors
Strategy optimization for achieving specific pentest goals (e.g., data exfiltration, privilege escalation)
License
MIT
Available Tools
1 toolpentestthinkingMCPC
Advanced reasoning tool with multiple strategies including Beam Search and Monte Carlo Tree Search
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| attackStep | Yes | Current attack step or action in the penetration test | |
| attackStepNumber | Yes | Current step number in the attack chain | |
| totalAttackSteps | Yes | Total expected steps in the attack chain | |
| nextAttackStepNeeded | Yes | Whether another attack step is needed | |
| strategyType | No | Attack strategy to use (beam_search or mcts) |
TDQS
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden but offers minimal behavioral information. It mentions strategy types but doesn't describe what the tool returns, whether it's read-only or has side effects, how long it might take to execute, or what kind of reasoning output it produces. For a tool with 5 parameters and no annotation coverage, this is insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise with just one sentence, but it's front-loaded with the core concept. However, it could be more efficient by specifying what the tool actually produces rather than just describing it as a 'reasoning tool.'
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with 5 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It doesn't explain what the tool returns, how the reasoning is applied, or what value it provides in penetration testing. The agent would be left guessing about the tool's output format and practical application.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters thoroughly. The description doesn't add any meaningful parameter information beyond what's in the schema - it mentions strategy types but the schema already defines the enum values and their purpose. Baseline 3 is appropriate when schema does the heavy lifting.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states it's an 'Advanced reasoning tool with multiple strategies' which provides a general purpose, but it's vague about what it actually does - it doesn't specify what the tool outputs or how it helps with penetration testing. It mentions strategy types but doesn't explain what the tool produces or how it aids decision-making.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There's no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or what context it's appropriate for. The description mentions strategy types but doesn't explain when to choose beam_search versus mcts or what problems this tool is designed to solve in penetration testing workflows.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
TDQS
With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The tool's purpose is clearly distinct as it is the sole tool available.
A single tool inherently has perfect naming consistency since there are no other tools to compare against. The naming follows a clear pattern as it stands alone.
A single tool for a server named 'PentestThinkingMCP' suggests a thin or incomplete surface, as pentesting typically involves multiple operations like scanning, exploitation, and reporting. This feels too minimal for the apparent scope.
Inferring the domain as pentesting or security testing, the tool set is severely incomplete. It lacks essential operations such as vulnerability scanning, network reconnaissance, or report generation, which are core to pentesting workflows.
Maintenance
Resources
Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.
Looking for Admin?
If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.
Related MCP Connectors
Offline methodology engine for authorized penetration testing, CTF, and security research.
AI pentesting: run scans, triage vulnerabilities, review PRs, manage schedules and assets.
Hunt zero-days by talking to binaries. 40+ tools. Hosted, OAuth + SSO, invite: hi@byteray.ai
MCP server for Pentest-Tools.com: run scans, manage findings and reports via your preffered LLM.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceAn automated penetration testing framework that enables intelligent security assessments through reconnaissance, vulnerability scanning, and controlled exploitation. Features AI-driven workflow management with comprehensive reporting for authorized security testing.252797BSD 3-Clause
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables automated penetration testing workflow planning using Beam Search and Monte Carlo Tree Search algorithms to generate step-by-step attack paths, score vulnerabilities, and recommend tools for reconnaissance, exploitation, and privilege escalation tasks.38MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAutonomous penetration testing powered by a local LLM, automating tool chaining for recon, vulnerability scanning, exploit research, and reporting.1
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceAI-powered penetration testing framework that can operate as an MCP server, enabling automated security assessments through natural language commands.2MIT
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/LT7T/SecMCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server