video_mograph_progress

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description indicates it creates a video file and returns a status dict, but it does not disclose whether existing files at output_path are overwritten or any other side effects. With no annotations, the description should carry this burden.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and structured with Args/Returns, but the first sentence is redundant with the second. Could be more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, parameters, and return value. Missing details like file format, overwrite behavior, or constraints on duration. An output schema is present but not shown; the description provides return structure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All 6 parameters are explained with clear descriptions, including acceptable values for style, hex codes for colors, and defaults. This compensates for the 0% schema description coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it generates a progress bar or loading animation video. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tool `video_mograph_count`, which may produce a similar countdown animation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It only describes what the tool does, not when it's appropriate or when to avoid it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.