pastorsimon1798/mcp-video
Related Servers
Alternatives to pastorsimon1798/mcp-video
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables comprehensive video and audio processing using FFmpeg, supporting tasks like metadata extraction, clipping, scaling, and adding transitions or overlays. It provides a high-performance interface for building media processing microservices via FastMCP.1211-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides 30+ FFmpeg video and audio editing tools via MCP, enabling AI assistants to perform operations like trimming, transcoding, overlays, and composition directly.274MIT
- FlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides video editing tools via ffmpeg, enabling tasks like trimming, merging, adding overlays, and format conversion.16-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for programmatic video editing using ffmpeg, enabling draft creation and refinement via natural language.6 npmISC
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables LLMs to perform FFmpeg operations like clipping, merging, extracting audio, adding subtitles, and transcoding videos via a set of tools exposed as an MCP server.59MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables agentic video editing and composition via MCP, allowing creation and manipulation of multi-track timelines with clips, transitions, filters, and text overlays, then rendering to MP4 using the melt-7 CLI.-
TDQS
Scored across 135 tools
With 135 tools, many serve overlapping purposes (e.g., multiple text overlay tools, multiple glitch effects, multiple audio generation tools). Without the search_tools helper, an agent would frequently misselect. The descriptions help but the sheer volume causes confusion.
Most tools follow a consistent prefix-based pattern (video_, audio_, effect_, glitch_, hyperframes_). A few exceptions like storyboard_read or hyperframes_to_mcpvideo break the pattern, but overall naming is predictable and readable.
135 tools is far too many for a single MCP server. Even sophisticated workflows can be covered with far fewer tools. The count overwhelms agents and suggests poor scoping.
The tool set covers nearly every conceivable video and audio operation: editing, effects, transitions, compositing, AI features, workflow management, and even storyboard/project tools. No obvious gaps for standard video production tasks.