Skip to main content
Glama
Kuldip99123

kluno-verify-mcp

by Kuldip99123

Server Configuration

Describes the environment variables required to run the server.

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
KLUNO_API_KEYYesYour Kluno API key, from your dashboard at kluno.xyz.
KLUNO_API_BASENoOverrides the API base URL (defaults to https://kluno.xyz). Only needed for local/staging testing against a non-production Kluno instance.https://kluno.xyz

Instructions

Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.

This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.

Capabilities

Features and capabilities supported by this server

Protocol revision2025-11-25

CapabilityDetails
tools
{}

Tools

Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions

NameDescription
verify_emailA

Verify whether an email address is deliverable using Kluno. Returns an honest status (valid / invalid / catch-all / unknown) — Kluno never guesses a fake "valid" the way some verifiers do, so "unknown" is a real, meaningful answer (e.g. the mailbox sits behind a security gateway or the mail server would not give a clear answer).

Prompts

Interactive templates invoked by user choice

NameDescription

No prompts

Resources

Contextual data attached and managed by the client

NameDescription

No resources

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Scored across 1 tool

Disambiguation5/5

There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another operation. Its purpose is clear and distinct.

Naming Consistency5/5

The single tool name `verify_email` follows a clear verb_noun snake_case convention. No inconsistent naming exists to compare against.

Tool Count4/5

A single-purpose email verification server can reasonably expose one focused tool. The count is minimal but not mismatched to the domain, though it offers no room for related operations like batch verification.

Completeness4/5

The tool covers the core verification operation and returns a rich status taxonomy including `valid`, `invalid`, `catch-all`, and `unknown`. Minor possible gaps such as bulk verification or historical results are not strictly required for the stated purpose.