Skip to main content
Glama
Kuldip99123

kluno-verify-mcp

by Kuldip99123
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to kluno-verify-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • InboxValid MCP Server

      aayusharmaaa
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables email address verification through a single MCP tool, returning whether an address is valid, invalid, or risky.
      1
      -

    • InboxValid MCP Server

      siddreddy07
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides email verification as an MCP tool, checking format, disposable domains, and mail server availability with structured results.
      -
    • BounceLens Email Check by bouncelens

      BounceLens Email Checkofficial

      bouncelens
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to validate email addresses locally before sending or saving them, detecting typos, disposable domains, dead domains, bad syntax, role addresses, duplicates, and provider information.
      2
      -

    • email-verify

      Baneado98
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables real-time email verification via MCP tools, checking syntax, MX, disposable domains, and optional SMTP probe to determine deliverability with a VALID/RISKY/INVALID verdict.
      2
      11 npm
      MIT
    • smtping-mcp by smtping

      smtping-mcpofficial

      smtping
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Email Verification MCP: Verify email addresses, clean lists up to 100,000 addresses and check spamtrap, disposable, spambot and complainer lists from Claude, Cursor or VS Code.
      60 npm
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    There is only one tool, so there is no possibility of confusing it with another operation. Its purpose is clear and distinct.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name `verify_email` follows a clear verb_noun snake_case convention. No inconsistent naming exists to compare against.

    Tool Count4/5

    A single-purpose email verification server can reasonably expose one focused tool. The count is minimal but not mismatched to the domain, though it offers no room for related operations like batch verification.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers the core verification operation and returns a rich status taxonomy including `valid`, `invalid`, `catch-all`, and `unknown`. Minor possible gaps such as bulk verification or historical results are not strictly required for the stated purpose.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources