get_config

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. Description only states it 'gets' configuration, implying a read-only operation, but does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether it requires specific permissions, what side effects might occur, or if it caches results.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no unnecessary words, front-loaded with the core action. Excellent conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite no parameters and low complexity, the description lacks details about the output format or what keys/values are returned. Without an output schema, the description should specify what configuration fields are included (e.g., probe version, server address). This omission reduces completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters exist so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no parameter-level semantics, but since there are none, a baseline score of 3 is appropriate. Could have elaborated on what 'configuration' encompasses.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it retrieves current probe and server configuration. While the verb 'Get' and object 'configuration' are specific, it does not distinguish from sibling tools like 'device_info' which might also return configuration details.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., 'device_info', 'probe_command'). Should specify that this returns configuration settings, not runtime state or debugging info.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.