write_file

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The term 'agent-sudo policy enforcement' is vague and not explained. No annotations are provided, so the description should disclose side effects (e.g., overwrites, permissions) but does not.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence. While short, it front-loads the primary action and policy context, though it sacrifices detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and simple parameters, the description is minimally complete. However, it lacks information on behavior (e.g., overwrite policy, error handling) that an agent would need.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with parameter descriptions already present. The description adds 'UTF-8 text content' and 'File path to write', which overlap with schema, providing minimal extra value. Baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool writes a file and mentions the agent-sudo policy enforcement. It distinguishes from siblings like read_file and run_shell_command, but could be more specific about file types or constraints.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like read_file or run_shell_command for file operations. The description lacks context for agent decision-making.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.