Skip to main content
Glama
Kisyntra

agent-sudo-mcp

by Kisyntra

Related Servers

Alternatives to agent-sudo-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides permission gates and tamper-evident audit logging for AI agent tool executions, with declarative policies, consent ladders, and hash-chained verification.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables controlled AI-agent access to enterprise-shaped tools with a deny-by-default gated write path, human approval, dry-run execution, and append-only audit logging.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Human-in-the-loop approval gateway for agent tool calls: agents request, policies decide, humans approve via Slack/Discord/web — with an OWASP-LLM-Top-10-tagged audit trail. Self-hostable.
      10
      18 npm
      33
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A local proxy in front of any MCP server for developers on Claude Code or Cursor: see every tool call your agent makes, hold the risky ones for your approval, and keep a secret-redacted journal that is tamper-evident with an external anchor.
      1,050 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enforces policy controls for AI agents, including spend limits, action approvals, kill switch, scoped credentials, dry-run diffs, loop prevention, and auditable hash-chained logs.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: getting runtime context, reading files, running shell commands, and writing files. No overlap in functionality.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow the verb_noun pattern (get_runtime_context, read_file, run_shell_command, write_file), providing a consistent and predictable interface.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 4 tools, the server is well-scoped for its demo/reference purpose. The count is not too low or too high for the functionality offered.

    Completeness4/5

    The tools cover the core operations (read, write, execute, context), but it lacks common file operations like listing or deletion, which may be needed for full workflows.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessResponsive