mcp-google-forms
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-google-forms
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for reading, editing, and publishing Google Forms with the official Google Forms API. Enables AI agents to programmatically create, modify, and manage forms and responses.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Microsoft Forms automation, enabling AI agents to inspect forms, resolve branching, validate and submit answers, upload files, and manage response links.49 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude to persistently manage Google Forms through a remote MCP server, including creating and editing forms, configuring quizzes and scoring, publishing or closing forms, and retrieving responses.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Google Docs, Sheets & Drive with full formatting support.470 npm1MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server for the Google Forms API that enables creating and editing forms, publishing them, reading responses, and setting up push notifications from AI clients using natural language.19100 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceMCP server for Dashform (getaiform.com) - create and manage AI-powered forms, quizzes, and surveys. Supports form creation, response collection, analytics, and AI-driven form building with 15 tools across form management, response handling, and AI operations.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 19 tools
Each tool has a distinct purpose with clear boundaries. Question type additions are separate, bulk operations are explicitly named, and utility tools like auth_status and raw_batch_update are well-defined.
Most tools follow verb_noun snake_case pattern. Minor deviations like 'auth_status' (noun instead of verb) and 'raw_batch_update' (adjective prefix) are present but do not significantly hinder consistency.
19 tools appropriately cover the scope of Google Forms management including creation, editing, bulk operations, responses, and authentication, without being overwhelming or sparse.
Core CRUD for questions, form settings, and responses are covered. Missing question types (e.g., linear scale, date) and lack of question type change are minor gaps, but the tool set is sufficient for quiz management.