runsheet-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to runsheet-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA local stdio MCP server that gives Claude (or any MCP client) full programmatic control over a single YouTube channel, including video upload, channel management, comments, analytics, and more.4611 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents to control a YouTube channel end-to-end by uploading videos, editing metadata, managing playlists, moderating comments, and reading analytics through MCP tools.20MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude to control a YouTube channel through MCP, including uploading and editing videos, scheduling releases, and reading channel and video analytics via official APIs.8MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables users to access their own YouTube channel, videos, and analytics through MCP-compatible clients such as ChatGPT and Claude, exposing tools for channel stats, video listing, video analytics, and video search.11 npm-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenance- Upload videos to YouTube from MCP - Client(Claude/Cursor/VS Code) - OAuth2 authentication flow - Access token and refresh token management - Multi Channel Support59MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables managing a YouTube channel through natural language: upload videos, edit metadata, set thumbnails, run pseudo A/B thumbnail tests, and pull analytics.-
TDQS
Scored across 11 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: reads are separated by channel, schedule, library, and watchlist, while local listing, text utilities, thumbnail generation, and upload have non-overlapping purposes. The descriptions make the boundaries clear, so an agent should not confuse them.
All tools use the same runsheet_ prefix and snake_case verb_noun convention (get_*, list_*, count_*, preserve_*, style_*, make_*, upload_*), with no deviations or mixed styles.
Eleven tools is well within the typical 3-15 range for a focused YouTube channel management server. Each tool appears to earn its place by covering a distinct read, utility, or upload operation.
Several descriptions reference write tools that are not present in the surface (runsheet_schedule_video, runsheet_update_metadata, runsheet_file_to_playlist, runsheet_break_down_breakout), creating dead ends for scheduling existing videos, updating metadata, filing to playlists, and breakout analysis. Missing core write operations beyond upload means agents will fail on common workflows.