Skip to main content
Glama
K-Jadeja

@kjadeja/open-featurebase-mcp

by K-Jadeja

get_featurebase_stalled_promises

Find feedback posts where the customer last replied and the admin has been silent for a set number of days, enabling teams to follow up on stalled conversations.

Instructions

Find posts where admin replied, customer spoke last, admin silent for N+ days.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMaximum number of stalled promises to return (1-50). Default: 20.
sortByNoSort order for returned stalled promises. 'staleness' (default): customerLastReplyDate desc — most-recent stalled promises first. 'freshness': adminLastReplyDate desc — most-recent admin replies first (catch up on what you just said). 'upvotes': upvotes desc — focus on high-impact items regardless of staleness.staleness
statusNoRestrict candidates to posts with these statuses (e.g. ['in_progress', 'in_review'] to exclude Completed and Planned). When omitted, all statuses are eligible.
teamUserIdsNoOptional override for the team-user-id set. When provided as a NON-EMPTY array, these IDs REPLACE the FEATUREBASE_TEAM_USER_IDS env var for this call only — the env var is ignored. Use this together with find_featurebase_user to run a stalled-promise query without env-var configuration. An EMPTY array ([]) is treated as ABSENT — the env var team is used if configured; otherwise stalled-promises returns immediately with teamSource='none' and a warning. Engagement fields are re-computed on the fly from cached comments using this set.
minDaysSinceAdminReplyNoMinimum number of days since the admin's last reply for a post to qualify as a stalled promise. Default: 7. Set to 0 to surface every post where the customer spoke last, regardless of age.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states the high-level purpose. It does not mention how teamUserIds override works, sorting behavior, or any side effects. The schema descriptions compensate, but the tool description itself is insufficient for behavioral transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that is easy to parse and front-loaded. It avoids unnecessary words. However, it could be slightly more structured (e.g., mentioning key parameters like default N days) without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 5 parameters, no output schema, and moderate complexity (team override, sorting, status filter), the one-sentence description is too minimal. It does not explain output format, behavior of the 'N' parameter, or nuance like empty teamUserIds. The description is incomplete for an agent to fully understand the tool's capabilities.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with detailed parameter descriptions. The tool description adds no parameter info beyond what the schema provides. Per rubric, baseline 3 is appropriate since the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool finds posts where admin replied, customer spoke last, and admin is silent for N+ days. It identifies the specific resource (stalled promises) and verb (find). However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like list_featurebase_posts or search_featurebase_posts, which could also retrieve posts with conditions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool vs alternatives. The description lacks information about prerequisites (e.g., need for FEATUREBASE_TEAM_USER_IDS env var) or scenarios where this tool is inappropriate. Sibling tool names are listed but not contrasted.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/K-Jadeja/open-featurebase-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server