Skip to main content
Glama
K-Jadeja

@kjadeja/open-featurebase-mcp

by K-Jadeja

get_featurebase_post

Retrieve a specific feedback post by slug, optionally including its full comment thread.

Instructions

Get a single post by slug, optionally with full comment thread.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
slugYesThe post slug (the URL path segment after /posts/). Example: 'more-byok-options'
teamUserIdsNoOptional override for the team-user-id set. When provided as a NON-EMPTY array, comments (and engagement fields on the post) are re-classified using these IDs as the team — useful for drilling into a single thread after calling find_featurebase_user. A non-empty override REPLACES the FEATUREBASE_TEAM_USER_IDS env var for this call only. An EMPTY array ([]) is treated as ABSENT — the env var is used if configured. With no env var configured AND no teamUserIds passed, comment authors will show role='unknown' and engagement fields will be omitted.
include_commentsNoIf true, fetch and inline the full comment thread as a `comments` array on the response (nested with `replies`). Each comment carries author (name, userId, role='admin'|'customer'|'unknown'), bodyHtml, bodyText, createdAt, updatedAt, upvotes, parentId, and replies[]. On fetch failure the post is still returned with `commentsError` set. Default: false.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only mentions the basic functionality and optional comment inclusion, omitting key behaviors like error handling (e.g., if slug is not found), authorization requirements, or whether it is a read-only operation. The parameter documentation provides some detail but the main description lacks transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence of 16 words, efficiently conveying the core purpose. It is front-loaded and lacks fluff, though it could benefit from an extra sentence about usage context without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is too minimal given the tool's complexity (3 parameters, no output schema). It does not outline the return structure of the post object or the comments data, leaving the agent to infer from the parameter descriptions. Crucial information like required authentication or possible error responses is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with detailed descriptions for all three parameters. The main description adds only the high-level idea of 'optionally with full comment thread,' which is already implied by the 'include_comments' parameter. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the description adds minimal value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Get a single post by slug, optionally with full comment thread,' using a specific verb and resource. It clearly distinguishes from sibling tools like 'get_featurebase_posts' (plural) which would fetch multiple posts.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving a specific post given a slug, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives like 'list_featurebase_posts' or 'search_featurebase_posts'. No exclusions or when-not-to-use guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/K-Jadeja/open-featurebase-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server