Skip to main content
Glama
John-CEO-HQ

John CEO Agentic Memory

by John-CEO-HQ

Related Servers

Alternatives to John CEO Agentic Memory

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server providing agents with persistent working, episodic, and semantic memory backed by CockroachDB, exposed via tools to store, recall, list, and forget memories.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server providing semantic memory storage and retrieval using vector embeddings powered by LanceDB and Google Gemini. It supports multi-tenant isolation and bucket-based organization for managing structured memories through natural language queries.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that provides persistent semantic memory backed by PostgreSQL and pgvector for storing and searching thoughts via vector embeddings. It enables dimensional organization, conflict detection, and historical tracking of facts, decisions, and observations.
      1 npm
      AGPL 3.0

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool serves a clearly distinct purpose: write persists, search retrieves, recall_context packs, forget maintains. There is no overlap in functionality, reducing risk of misselection.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent memory_verb pattern (memory_write, memory_search, memory_recall_context, memory_forget). The naming is predictable and uniform, simplifying agent tool selection.

    Tool Count5/5

    Four tools is a tightly scoped set that covers the core memory operations without redundancy. Each tool earns its place, fitting the recommended 3-15 range.

    Completeness5/5

    The set covers the full memory lifecycle: create/write, retrieve/search, recall context for injection, and forget/maintenance for updates and deletions. No obvious gaps for the stated purpose of persistent user memory.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues