Estadísticas Conoce tu seguro (SIC)

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds that queries are by period, which aligns with the readOnlyHint and destructiveHint annotations. However, it does not disclose pagination, authorization, or output specifics. Since annotations already indicate a safe read operation, the description adds only modest context and does not contradict the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence under 20 words, front-loaded with the tool's purpose and free of any filler or redundant detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description gives a basic purpose and period scope, but lacks guidance on selection among the many seguros-focused siblings and does not explain what the SIC statistics represent. The existence of an output schema helps cover return values, but the description remains thin for a tool with 2 parameters and read-only behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description only mentions 'por período' (by period), which loosely connects to the 'desde' and 'hasta' params. It does not clarify which parameter is the start or end date, nor that they are optional, leaving the meaning incomplete.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('consultas') and resource ('pólizas de seguros') within the 'Conoce tu seguro' (SIC) system, clearly distinguishing it from other seguros-related sibling tools. The scope of 'por período' adds further specificity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for retrieving SIC statistics by period but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus other seguros siblings (e.g., cmf_seguros_siniestros, cmf_seguros_eeff). No alternatives or exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.