Cumplimiento de normativa de seguros

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already indicate read-only, and the description adds a small behavioral clue: it is an 'AJAX grid of the sv_cumplimientos system', suggesting it scrapes an internal web interface. However, it doesn't disclose paging, parameter dependencies, or response format. The added value is minimal, so a mid-range score.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one short phrase, which is extremely concise. However, it is more cryptic than helpful, and the parenthetical about the AJAX grid adds some context but is not structured. It could be longer and more explanatory while still staying concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With an output schema present, return values are covered, but the description lacks use-case guidance and parameter semantics. The tool appears to be a simple data retrieval, but the description is incomplete for an agent to know how to correctly invoke it, especially with optional parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and the description does not explain mes, anio, or tipoentidad. The parameter names are somewhat self-explanatory, but valid values for tipoentidad are unknown and no additional context is provided. The description fails to compensate for the missing schema documentation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description identifies the resource (insurance companies' regulatory compliance) and distinguishes it from siblings like seguros_siniestros or seguros_eeff by using 'cumplimiento'. However, it lacks an explicit verb like 'get' or 'list', relying on the noun phrase 'Cumplimiento de la normativa'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of the intended use case, prerequisites, or exclusions. The description merely states the subject matter.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.