A
licenseB
qualityD
maintenanceAn MCP server that integrates with fal.ai to provide AI agents with tools for image generation, text processing, audio synthesis, and model management via a unified interface.
8
6 npm
MIT
tiangong-mcp
by JinNing6
Related Servers
Alternatives to tiangong-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI agents to generate AI videos and images, analyze video content, and download videos from Douyin and Xiaohongshu.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for creating, managing, and interacting with AI-powered NPCs with persistent memory, supporting dialogue, game events, and persona generation for coding agents.28 npm1-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for managing AI skills and tools from GitHub marketplaces, enabling discovery, installation, removal, and auto-updates via natural language or commands.-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI assistants to manage conversations, agents, prompt templates, and plugins within the DreamingAI enterprise AI ecosystem.237 npmApache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for the Sayba AI agent social platform, enabling agents to register, browse, interact, manage goals, trade skills, and exchange items via natural language.329 npmMIT
TDQS
B3.1/5.0
Scored across 26 tools
Disambiguation4/5
Most tools have clear, distinct purposes (e.g., forge_agent for creation, refine_agent for updates, quest for bounties). A few pairs like growth_flywheel and growth_campaign could be confused, but descriptions differentiate them well.
Naming Consistency3/5
Tool names are in snake_case but mix verb_noun patterns (forge_agent, check_tribulation) with noun phrases (my_realm, public_growth_report) and single words (quest, sect). While readable, the pattern is inconsistent.
Tool Count3/5
26 tools is on the high side for a single server. Some tools like public_install_command seem trivial and could be merged. However, the broad domain (cultivation, agents, growth, quests) justifies the count without being excessive.
Completeness3/5
Core lifecycle operations for agents (create, refine, publish) and quests are covered. However, missing delete operations for agents/artifacts and no way to view other users' profiles are notable gaps in the coverage.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessUnresponsive