Skip to main content
Glama
Jimil-Joshi

BlastRadius MCP

Related Servers

Alternatives to BlastRadius MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables autonomous agents to run shell and subprocess commands through a guardrail that blocks destructive system mutations, path traversals, and reverse shells. It also adds prompt-injection detection, spend circuit breakers, loop detection, and privacy sanitization so agent execution stays within safe, budgeted bounds.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to securely invoke tools by enforcing identity proof, capability verification, and risk scoring on every request, blocking unsafe calls before they execute.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables autonomous agents to enforce financial guardrails by tracking real-time token burn and cost velocity, automatically throttling or freezing execution when budgets are exceeded. It also blocks destructive shell commands, prompt injections, and runaway planning loops while sanitizing outputs before they are returned.
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables LLM agents to access third-party APIs through a least-privilege set of audited tools with allowlists, per-caller scopes, label gates, write confirmation, limits, and PII-masked logging. It restricts reads to labeled data, prevents sending or destructive actions, and records every allowed or denied call.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a secure MCP boundary for AI agents, intercepting and validating tool calls, redacting secrets, and requiring human approval for sensitive actions with a tamper-evident audit trail.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables secure MCP agent operations by enforcing fail-closed policies, blocking dangerous tool calls, scanning outputs for prompt injection, and recording every action in a tamper-evident audit log.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct primary purpose spanning prediction, DLP scanning, posture reporting, policy enforcement, token issuance, and audit verification. There is mild overlap where enforce_policy also scans parameters for DLP and evaluates actions like simulate_action, but the descriptions clarify their respective roles well.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All six tools follow a strict verb_noun pattern (simulate_action, inspect_payload_dlp, get_security_posture, enforce_policy, request_confirmation_token, verify_audit_log). The convention is applied uniformly with no deviations.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well-scoped for a security guardrail server, with each tool mapping to a discrete responsibility in the pre-execution safety workflow. No tool feels redundant or missing at the count level.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers a full guardrail lifecycle: simulation, DLP inspection, policy enforcement, step-up approval, posture reporting, and audit verification. Minor gaps exist such as no tool to view/configure policy definitions or revoke issued tokens, but core workflows are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues