Skip to main content
Glama
Jiangw2718i

frisk-mcp

by Jiangw2718i
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to frisk-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • OceanAlt AML (archived, moved)

      OceanAlt
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Archived and no longer maintained. Tools and prices shown here are out of date. Use the maintained server: glama.ai/mcp/servers/OceanAlt666/oceanalt-aml-mcp (GitHub: OceanAlt666/oceanalt-aml-mcp).
      220 npm
      MIT

    • oceanalt-aml-mcp

      OceanAlt666
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to screen blockchain addresses and evaluate payment counterparties before funds move, returning clear/caution/risky verdicts, risk scores, and clickable evidence across EVM chains, Tron, and Solana. It also supports anti-blind-signing checks, x402 payment-requirement verification, identity/control baselines, and signed evidence bundles, with free tools and optional paid compliance tools.
      15
      220 npm
      MIT

    • address-intel-api

      TKtokyo
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Provides counterparty risk checks for any EVM address, returning malicious-history flags, tiered risk scoring, and plain-language summaries via x402 payment.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap. The tool's purpose is singular and clearly defined.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool uses a clear verb_noun pattern ('screen_payment'), which is consistent and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool feels thin for a general-purpose server, but for a narrowly focused payment screening service, it may be sufficient. It's borderline on the calibration scale.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers the essential screening workflow (address checks, policy, etc.), but lacks auxiliary capabilities like configuration or reporting. Minor gaps that agents can work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessWithin a week

    Resources