Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to frisk-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Crypto compliance tools for AI-agent payments: screen any address for sanctions, frozen-stablecoin and hacker/mixer exposure across 8+ chains, trace fund taint, and get an allow/review/decline decision before settlement. Free keyless address checks; deeper endpoints are x402-payable.
      95 npm
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides counterparty risk checks for any EVM address, returning malicious-history flags, tiered risk scoring, and plain-language summaries via x402 payment.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Pay-per-call checks an AI agent runs before it moves money: token safety verdicts and wallet risk profiles on Base, on-chain payment verification, IBAN/VAT/BIC/LEI/ISIN validation, and live TLS and email-spoofing posture for a domain. Paid in USDC over x402 with no API key or account; the free payment_info tool explains the pricing.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Pre-flight oracle for x402 endpoints — gives any MCP-aware agent (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Continue) tools to detect decoys, zombies, and price traps before paying. Wraps preflight, forensics, decoy-blacklist, and watch-subscription endpoints from x402station.io.
      10
      56 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Routes blockchain address screening to third-party KYC/AML providers and checks public sanctions lists, serving as a clean-money gate primitive for MCP-compatible agents.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap. The tool's purpose is singular and clearly defined.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool uses a clear verb_noun pattern ('screen_payment'), which is consistent and predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool feels thin for a general-purpose server, but for a narrowly focused payment screening service, it may be sufficient. It's borderline on the calibration scale.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool covers the essential screening workflow (address checks, policy, etc.), but lacks auxiliary capabilities like configuration or reporting. Minor gaps that agents can work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessWithin a week