get_user
Retrieve an X/Twitter user's profile details by providing their username.
Instructions
Get a user's X/Twitter profile by username.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| username | Yes |
Retrieve an X/Twitter user's profile details by providing their username.
Get a user's X/Twitter profile by username.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| username | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only states the basic action. It does not disclose potential rate limits, authentication requirements, error conditions, or any side effects. For a read operation, some transparency is needed but absent.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no unnecessary words. Front-loaded with the core purpose. Efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and low complexity, the description provides minimal context. It does not mention return data, potential limitations, or prerequisites, which would help completeness.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has one parameter 'username' with 0% description coverage. The description adds 'by username', clarifying the param's role, but adds no further meaning like format, constraints, or examples.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'Get a user's X/Twitter profile by username', specifying verb, resource, and method. It distinguishes from siblings like get_my_profile or get_timeline by focusing on retrieving another user's profile by username.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_my_profile (for own profile) or get_user_tweets. The context is implied but no explicit exclusions or conditions are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/JialiangFan/X-MCP-2.0'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server