get_tweet
Fetch a tweet by its ID to access its content and metadata.
Instructions
Get a specific tweet by its ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| tweetId | Yes |
Fetch a tweet by its ID to access its content and metadata.
Get a specific tweet by its ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| tweetId | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must fully disclose behavior. Only states a read operation, but does not mention authentication, rate limits, idempotency, error handling, or return format.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, direct sentence with no wasted words. Front-loaded with verb and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With 1 parameter, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is too minimal. Agent lacks info on return structure, error responses, or behavioral constraints.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%. The description only says 'by its ID', adding no detail beyond the parameter name. No format, constraints, or examples are provided.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (Get) and resource (tweet) with the method (by its ID). It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_timeline or search_tweets which return multiple tweets.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., search_tweets for query-based retrieval). Lacks any context about prerequisites or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/JialiangFan/X-MCP-2.0'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server