Skip to main content
Glama
Jay4242

MCP SearxNG Search

by Jay4242
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP SearxNG Search

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • searxng-mcp

      fighter3005
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server that provides a search_web tool to query a self-hosted SearXNG instance and return structured web search results.
      1
      -

    • mcp-searxng-local

      dduartee
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for local web search via SearXNG, providing unlimited queries without API keys or cost, with automatic fallback to public instances.
      3
      1
      MIT

    • mcp_server_searXNG

      panxingfeng
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A privacy-friendly web search MCP server using SearXNG, enabling searches across multiple engines and categories.
      1
      MIT

    • SearXNG MCP Server

      aicrafted
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables web search capabilities by integrating with a SearXNG instance to aggregate results from over 130 engines. It allows users to perform filtered searches across categories like news, science, and social media while supporting advanced parameters for language and time range.
      9
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of ambiguity or overlap between tools. The single tool 'searxng_search' has a clear, distinct purpose for web searching.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'searxng_search' follows a consistent pattern (noun_verb style), and with only one tool, there is no inconsistency to evaluate. The naming is straightforward and descriptive.

    Tool Count2/5

    A single tool for a search server is too minimal for effective agent use. While it covers the core search function, it lacks supporting tools (e.g., for filtering, advanced queries, or handling different search types), making the scope feel thin and incomplete for a typical search domain.

    Completeness2/5

    The tool surface is severely incomplete for a search server. It only provides basic search functionality without any tools for related operations like image search, news search, autocomplete, or result management, leading to significant gaps that will limit agent capabilities.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources