searchProducts
Search food products by name, brand, or category to access nutritional details and compare options.
Instructions
Search products by name, brand, or category
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | ||
| page | No | ||
| pageSize | No |
Search food products by name, brand, or category to access nutritional details and compare options.
Search products by name, brand, or category
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| query | Yes | ||
| page | No | ||
| pageSize | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits. It only states the search action but omits details like pagination, sorting, or authentication requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single, well-structured sentence that is front-loaded. However, it could be slightly more informative without adding length.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given 3 parameters, many sibling tools, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is too minimal. It lacks details on return format, pagination behavior, and when to prefer this over alternatives.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It mentions searchable attributes but does not explain that 'query' should contain name/brand/category, nor does it detail 'page' and 'pageSize' beyond defaults.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description explicitly states the tool searches products by name, brand, or category. It uses a clear verb and resource, but does not differentiate from sibling tools like searchByBrand or searchByCategory.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs siblings such as advancedSearch or searchByBrand. The description lacks context about appropriate use cases or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Jatin-IITB/openproductsfacts-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server